Basics
- Introduction: Zero-Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) is an agricultural practice developed by Indian agriculturist Subhash Palekar
- Aim: ZBNF aims to reduce farmers’ reliance on costly chemical inputs and loans, promoting ecological balance, soil health, and economic sustainability.
- Why is it called so? : It’s called “zero-budget” because the idea is that farmers can grow crops without spending money on external inputs like fertilizers and pesticides.
Core Principles
- Jeevamrutha: A key input in ZBNF, Jeevamrutha is a microbial culture made of cow dung, cow urine, jaggery, pulse flour, water, and soil. This mix is applied to crops to enrich the soil with beneficial microbes, which improve nutrient availability.
- Beejamrutha: This is a seed treatment made from cow dung and cow urine, which protects seeds from soil-borne and seed-borne diseases. Beejamrutha coats the seeds with natural antibiotics and enhances germination.
- Mulching: ZBNF uses organic and soil mulching to protect soil moisture, regulate temperature, and prevent weed growth. Mulching also enriches the soil as organic matter decomposes.
- Acchadana: A practice of covering soil with organic matter, such as crop residues, to maintain soil moisture and encourage earthworms and other beneficial organisms.
- Waaphasa: This technique involves maintaining soil aeration and moisture balance by adjusting irrigation practices, reducing water usage, and creating a favourable environment for plant growth.
Benefits
- Cost Reduction: By minimising or eliminating the need for purchased inputs, ZBNF reduces farmers’ financial burdens.
- Improved Soil Health: Natural fertilisers and mulching improve soil structure, biodiversity, and nutrient cycling, leading to healthier, more fertile soil.
- Environmental Sustainability: ZBNF avoids chemical inputs, reducing pollution and promoting biodiversity.
- Increased Resilience: ZBNF’s focus on soil health, mulching, and moisture retention improves the resilience of crops to drought and extreme weather.
Challenges
- Initial Yield Loss: Transitioning from conventional chemical farming to ZBNF may lead to initial drops in crop yields as the soil and farming system adapt to the new approach.
- Knowledge and Skill Gaps: Many farmers lack the necessary knowledge and skills to implement ZBNF techniques effectively, which requires extensive training and education.
- Labour Intensity: ZBNF practices, such as mulching and soil preparation, demand more labour compared to conventional methods, which can be a challenge, especially for small-scale farmers.
- Scaling Issues: Applying ZBNF practices on a large scale can be difficult, particularly when farmers have small landholdings, and there are logistical challenges in distributing inputs like Jeevamrutha.
- Resistance to Change: Farmers accustomed to high-yield, input-intensive methods may resist switching to ZBNF due to scepticism about its long-term effectiveness and profitability.
- Lack of Infrastructure: The success of ZBNF often requires local production of natural inputs (like cow dung and urine), and the lack of infrastructure to produce and store these materials can hinder its adoption.
- Inconsistent Results: ZBNF effectiveness can vary depending on local conditions, soil types, and crops, making it harder to guarantee consistent success across different regions.
- Market Challenges: Lack of market support for ZBNF-grown produce, as well as premium pricing for organic products, can discourage farmers from adopting the system.