Why in the news?
- The pendency of cases in the Supreme Court has reached an all-time high of 88,417, even when the court is currently functioning with its full sanctioned judicial strength of 34 judges.
Pendency of Cases in the Indian Judiciary
- Causes of Pendency:
- Vacancies in Judiciary: High vacancy rate in both High Courts (~30%) and lower courts.
- Inadequate Infrastructure: Shortage of courtrooms, digital tools, and support staff.
- Low Judge-to-Population Ratio: India has around 21 judges per million people (ideal is 50+).
- Procedural Delays: Frequent adjournments, lengthy procedures, and misuse of PILs.
- Government as the Biggest Litigant: Around 50% of cases involve government departments.
- Lack of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Usage: Underutilization of Lok Adalats, arbitration, mediation.
- Poor Case Management: Absence of proper scheduling and tracking systems.
- Consequences
- Erosion of Public Trust in the legal system.
- Delayed Justice = Denied Justice – affects citizens’ rights and livelihoods.
- Negative Economic Impact – affects business confidence and contract enforcement.
- Overcrowded Prisons – many undertrials await hearings for years.
- Recent Initiatives:
- e-Courts Project: Digital filing, virtual hearings, and National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG).
- Fast Track Courts & Special Courts: For crimes against women, children, and corruption.
- Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR): Promoting Lok Adalats and mediation centers.
- Mission Mode Projects: Timely disposal of specific categories of cases.
- Judicial Appointments Reform: Proposals like the NJAC (struck down), continuing debate over collegium vs. commission.
- Way Forward
- Filling Vacancies Promptly
- Increasing Judicial Strength
- Improving Infrastructure & Technology
- Encouraging ADR Mechanisms
- Judicial Accountability & Transparency
- Reducing Government Litigation
- Case Management Reforms