Civil Service: Cadre-Based Civil Service and Lateral Entry in Civil Service

Cadre-Based Civil Service

  • A cadre is a small, well-trained group of people who serve as the foundational members of a military, political, or commercial organization.
  • After being chosen, candidates in All India Services are assigned cadres according to their qualifications, preferences, and position availability.
  • Issues
    • Permanent Cadres: This leads to unproductive and inefficient civil service operations. It lessens the character of all of India and restricts the officers’ interest in regional problems.
    • Provincialization: There is a perception that IAS officers are “all India” in name only, according to “Public Institutions in India 
    • Adoption of Best Practices: The ability of the civil services to absorb and spread best practices from other cadres is diminished by the provincialization of the civil service.
    • Collusion with Local Politicians: The cops conspire with other officers in the community to obtain coveted and high-ranking posts.
    • Significant Variation: The size of IAS cadres varies significantly as compared to the total population of each state. Eg. the IAS cadre in Sikkim is 15% higher than it should be and 40% smaller than it should be in Uttar Pradesh based only on population.

Lateral Entry in Civil Service

  • Induction of qualified applicants into bureaucracy by eschewing the conventional route at a higher level of its hierarchical structure is known as “lateral entry into civil services.”
  • The following are the eligibility requirements:  “Individuals working at comparable levels in Private Sector Companies, Consultancy Organisations, and International/Multinational Organisations with a minimum of 15 years experience”
  • Need for Lateral Entry
    • Shortage of Officers
    • Specialists and domain experts
    • Burden to Exchequer
    • Incentives for innovations and out-of-the-box thinking
    • To induce Competition
  • Issues With Lateral Entry
    • Lack of field exposure
    • Open door to privatization
    • Transparency in recruitment
    • Discontented Civil Servants
    • Lateral entry only at top-level policy-making positions may have little impact on field-level implementation. 
This entry was posted in General Studies 2, Governance. Bookmark the permalink.